Loading...

Question of the Month

Loading...
October 2009Paula Begoun 

Dear Paula,

You have written some very valuable columns, but there's one subject I've never seen covered that I think you’d be perfectly suited to comment on, and that’s skin care while traveling in an airplane. We all know to use stronger SPF while flying because of the intensity of the sun's rays at that height, but what needs to be covered is how to arrive at your destination without your face/foundation looking cakey and dried out from the very dry air found on airplanes. Is the answer to slather on moisturizer, and then 20 minutes from landing, apply the makeup? Is it simply not to wear makeup? Is it those expensive facial sprays that are mostly water? I'm sure Paula has learned a thing or two from her own travel experiences, but the rest of us would LOVE to know!

Ronda, via email


Dear Ronda ,

I do travel over 100,000 miles every year, sometimes more. From Australia to Korea, Canada, Mexico, Europe, and throughout the United States over a 12-month period is exhausting and wonderful. In terms of skin care, there really isn’t anything all that special to do in flight. Most of what you read in fashion and travel magazines about this topic doesn’t make sense. In the long run you have to experiment with what works for you but here are some basics that can help you the next time you fly the friendly skies:

It is indeed drier at 35,000 feet, but if you don’t have dry skin it doesn’t really matter. If you have dry skin and you are taking a long flight somewhere you may need to reapply moisturizer or a well-formulated toner that’s rich in skin-identical ingredients, but of course that assumes you are not wearing makeup. If you are wearing makeup, spraying water over your face is useless; it won’t get to the skin cells through the foundation. If you aren’t wearing makeup, spraying your face water is also useless unless you apply a moisturizer over it very quickly as it will just be evaporated by the air. In terms of expensive water, your skin cells can’t tell the difference. The only cells water can affect are the skin cells on the surface (the corneocytes of the epidermis) and they’re dead.

Because of airport security I always have my travel packets with me. In the years following enhanced security screenings they have always gotten through every airport around the world in my carry-on luggage and get by all on their own without taking up precious room in that little quart container you have to use for other liquids and creams. Not every company offers samples of all their products, or even some of their products, so in this case I’m making a shameless plug for my line Paula’s Choice (www.paulaschoice.com). Personally, I find them a great convenience and, as the tag line goes, when I travel, I “don’t leave home without them.”

For long flights over 5 hours I travel without makeup. It is better for my skin and I hate having to wash up twice in those tiny little bathrooms with their horrible lighting. If I have an appointment I have to get to then shortly before I land and before the fasten seatbelt sign is illuminated again, I do wash up in the bathroom. This involves applying my skin-care routine and then my makeup. It looks a lot better that way.

For shorter flights I just wear my makeup as usual only I don’t powder until just before I land when I touch up my makeup. That way I don’t have anything drying on my face during the flight. I may dab a bit more moisturizer around the eye area before I apply my makeup (pre-flight) but most of the time I just keep things status quo.

A higher altitude in the outdoors does require a higher rated SPF, but in an airplane up in the sky not much UV light is getting through those tiny windows. What you normally wear for sun protection, meaning an SPF 15 or greater with the right UVA-protecting ingredients,  will do just fine.

Happy trails!



Archive:
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
September 2003
October 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001