Loading...

Question of the Month

Loading...
February 2008

Paula Begoun I have very fine, straight, and thinning hair. My hairdresser wants to give me a perm that she swears will not in any way damage my hair, as the effects are not permanent and last only about three months. I can’t find any info on it and wonder if you know anything about it. It is called Texture Fusion. After 40 years of frosting my hair, I let it go gray. Although I love it, I miss the little bit of body I received from color-treating it. I do not like the feel of styling products as they just make my hair feel dirty. Is Texture Fusion a non-damaging option for my hair?

Karen, via email


Dear Karen,

First, to be absolutely clear, there is no such thing as a non-damaging perm. If chemicals applied to hair are strong enough to alter its shape for a period of months (or even weeks), they’re causing damage, no two ways about it. This is because of the way in which both perm and relaxer solutions work, since they have to break the very strong disulfide bonds that provide your hair’s natural shape before it can be curled or straightened. There is no gentle way to go about doing this. If there was, it would be sort of like being able to smash a window and then tape it back together and still get the same protection against drafts and the elements.

You’re right, it is difficult to find information about the texture fusion perm (which on line is marketed as a perm that provides texture but not curl). It appears that hair-care company Scruples is the main manufacturer of this type of perm (sold as Scruples Renewal). I reviewed the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for this perm’s solution because it lists the main ingredients in the product (essentially, it indicates which chemicals are doing the processing). The Scruples Renewal perm contains ammonium thioglycolate and diammonium dithioglycolate in a range of 5–10% each. Both of these ingredients are commonly used in acid perms and work to chemically change the shape of the hair by, you guessed it, breaking the disulfide bonds. The pH of this perm is 9.2, which is alkaline, but less so than many others, whose pH typically ranges from 12 to 14 (perms labeled “acid perms,” which is a misnomer, typically have an alkaline pH of 9 to 11). Therefore, the Scruples Renewal perm is labeled an acid perm.

Although these types of perms are gentler for hair (gentle being a relative term), it is a blatant falsehood to state that they don’t “damage hair in any way.” Your hairdresser may not know any better or may simply be repeating what is indicated in the marketing materials hairdressers see to decide which perms to use in their salon. Either way, although you’ll get results with this perm, they’ll come with the tradeoff of some amount of damage (and the damage may be more obvious given your fine, thinning hair).

Instead of getting this perm, I urge you to rethink your dismissal of styling products. There are so many outstanding options available for your hair type, and the best ones won’t make your hair feel dirty (how much you apply makes the difference in that respect, so be sure to use any styling product sparingly until you know how your hair responds). The liquid-to-foam mousses are excellent for your hair type. They allow you (with the aid of a blow dryer) to add soft shape, body, and smoothness without noticeable buildup. Some good ones to try include Aveda Phomollient ($13 for 6.7 ounces), Wella Liquid Hair Energy Styler Volumizing Mousse ($11.50 for 10.6 ounces), and L’Oreal Amped Up Mega Mousse Volumizing Mousse ($3.99 for 7.1 ounces).


Archive:
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
September 2003
October 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001